By Katherine D. Harris
In reading practices, we locate ourselves based on page numbers, running header titles, even an index and table of contents. The codex form makes it convenient to read left to right, in English, down the page and across several pages turned sequentially. (For some amusement, see the Monty Python-esque video, “Medieval Help Desk.”). We moved from the scroll to a more stable form for storing print text and images – the spine, binding, paper weight, ink, type, and organization are all tools for training readers to become consumers of the book. All of these elements of the page, called paratextual elements, were also created to control the reading experience, to offer reference points – as if reading forms a visual map to guide intellectual meanderings. This, a form of "screwing around," allows the mind to create associations among knowledge points – and we do this en masse. In Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Benedict Anderson argues that very large communities are formed simply by the act of reading similar materials: “[The community] is imagined because the members of even the smallest nation will never know most of their fellow-members, meet them, or even hear of them, yet in the minds of each lives the image of their communion. . . . it is imagined as a community, because, regardless of the actual inequality and exploitation that may prevail in each, the nation is always conceived as a deep, horizontal comradeship” (6-7).
But, if the knowledge is being mapped, especially with the codex form, how can we throw off the mantle of a center point and appreciate the multiplicity of perspectives and nationalism? After all, isn't this what gets the world into trouble? Trying to prove that one society has a broader and more advanced culture than another?